“Bi, Butch, and Bar Dyke: Pedagogical Performances of Class, Gender, and Sexuality” by Michelle Gibson, Martha Marinara, and Deborah Meem & “Voice in Writing Again: Embracing Contraries” by Peter Elbow
Both essays this week talked about voice.
“Bi, Butch, and Bar Dyke: Pedagogical Performances of Class, Gender,
and Sexuality” by Michelle Gibson, Martha Marinara, and
Deborah Meem was
an essay where the authors got really personal and talked about where they
stand in terms of their class, gender, and sexuality. These are all areas that
form part of our voice. I liked how the authors came through with a voice that
was perceived by me as clear and authentic. They mentioned how their voice in
the academia world was different due to what made them who they are. I found
this interesting because I’ve always thought about the uniqueness of voice and
how it can say so much based on who we are.
The authors
didn’t have any problem sharing personal facts about who they were. Their “labels”
shaped their voice and they weren’t afraid to say that. They admitted to know
that their voice was different than the one in the academia world and I found
that inspiring. We are all different and I find that that’s the beauty in
diversity. This essay by Gibson, Marinara, and Meem makes me think that we
should all bring our voice forward while respecting those that sound different
than ours.
The authors
mentioned that their backgrounds and the way they lived had played a role into
the voice they developed for their academic writing. I liked how they truly
showed that who they were was reflected in their writing. This makes their
writing authentic. They are not mocking someone else’s voice to fit the standard
in the academic world. They are coming as who they are and that is reflected in
their writing.
In the essay “Voice in Writing
Again: Embracing Contraries” by Peter Elbow it seem to me like he didn’t write towards
or against voice but rather for both. I can see what he means when he says that
both could be important but I find it really hard to separate the two. Even when
I am reading something from an author I don’t know I can sense their voice. Even
when that voice is dry and boring, I am able to get that from the reading and
in return, it makes me feel a certain way towards the author and what they are
saying in the reading. It is not like I can hear their real voice, like when I read
something from someone I know, but I can hear their tone and what’s coming
through the words they are choosing or the way they are saying what they’re
saying.
I
think that voice is so connected with writing because for instance, when we
read something by a male or a female we tend to, at times, read it differently.
We also tend to read things differently when we know something or a lot about
the particular author we are reading about.
No comments:
Post a Comment